Posted January 22, 2007
I finished Against the Day. Head spinning like a surrealist’s kaleidoscope, I wandered into the Pig and sat on the deck, smoking furiously, mostly silent, thinking about grace, the electromagnetic spectrum, defenseless families consigned to misery by wicked wealthy men, silver-nitrate photography, quaternions and the mathematics of four dimensions, dirigibles, the Ludlow Massacre, star-crossed lovers, Bosnian ghosts, death rays, the White City, Minkowskian space-time, Nagant 8mm revolvers, bilocation, the Great Game, the set of all sets that are not members of themselves, grim long-riders crossing death-haunted mountains in winter, Nikola Tesla, dynamite and its many practical uses, the Hallucinati, non-Euclidian geometries, passion and its inevitable cessation, the Golden City Lost To History And Time, transnational blood vendettas, Mysterious Bob Meldrum, the E region, Bela Lugosi, tunnel rats, the Ace of Spies, mayonnaise, vector space, Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his regrettable self-insertions into European history, calcite, simultaneity, the Tunguska Event, tesseracts, the Mexican Revolution, the direction of "remembering," penance and redemption, colliding parallel universes, multiple copulatory combinations I am unlikely to experience first-hand, infernal machines, Philip Marlowe's mean streets, Third Ypres, an elegaic Chopin nocturne plinked upon a ukulele, the aether, girls with wings, serial killers, the birth of the movies, a dog reading The Princess Casamassima and much more zooming through, over and around me like dark jangly radiation from an extradimensional star as yet unknown to astronomers (the Pynchon Effect being not unlike the late stages of an alpha-o trip, vivid and engrossing but prickly, filled w/ low-level anxiety, occasional tremors, intermittent double-refraction, unregistered colors and so forth), and thus was momentarily unmanned when a woman of more than casual interest to me appeared out of the darkness, seeming to step from the very pages of the book, I having attached her dark and mysterious beauty to the novel’s Yashmeen Halfcourt. Quite unsettling.
The Pig, after all, is exactly the kind of place one would expect to find le vrai Yashmeen, and in that first disassociated moment, trapped in the novel and half-convinced that I was out-of-phase w/ my own world line, I thought of Vienna and almost blurted out: "No matter what, don't go to the Excelsior Hotel. No matter what...."
--
This sort of thing has happened before. I read Gravity's Rainbow, the title of which refers to the arc of the trajectory of a ballistic missile, while underwater on a nuclear submarine carrying nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles. Of course my head exploded.
--
It's good to be back.
Comments
Anonymous thetomdotdot says...
Thats what I'm talking about.
Posted 23 January 2007, 6:56 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous OhioJayhawk says...
Somewhere, James Joyce is smiling a crooked smile.
Posted 23 January 2007, 7:40 a.m. Suggest removal
Tom King tomking says...
Exactly.
Posted 23 January 2007, 9:12 a.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
"Living backwards!" Alice repeated in great astonishment. "I never heard of such a thing!"
"--but there's one great advantage in it, that one's memory works both ways."
"I'm sure MINE only works one way," Alice remarked. "I can't remember things before they happen."
"It's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards," the Queen remarked.
Posted 23 January 2007, 9:40 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous lazz says...
Dude, that's amazing -- i was thinking exactly the same thing!
OK, maybe not. But I do have my head stuck in windy southern Sweden, at the onset of winter, as Detective Inspector Wallender tries to peel back the layers of wealth and respectability protecting a murderous international industrialist ... Hennning Mankell strikes again in "The Man Who Smiled." ...
Posted 23 January 2007, 10:03 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous bloozman says...
While trainstop once again misses the point, give him credit for this: That's a well-constructed sentence. I'll happily steal it for use where it actually applies. Thanks!
Posted 23 January 2007, 10:52 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous lazz says...
Anonymous and ignorant is no way to go through life, "trainstop9."
It's A-holes like you who were never really figured into the equations for the worldwide communications revolution that once seemed to hold so much promise for open exchange of ideas, thoughts, joys and hopes.
Go back to TV, willya?
Posted 23 January 2007, 11:07 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous scary_manilow says...
Been working on this since the day it came out. Many interuptions-- the holidays weren't kind to my reading time-- but I'm 3/4 of the way through now, and I seriously think it's his best work.
Haven't actually read your blog yet because I don't want anything to be spoiled... Did you enjoy it as much as I am?
Posted 23 January 2007, 12:16 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
Welcome back, kid.
You don't present yrself as much of a reader, but I encourage you to take a stab at _Against The Day_. Pynchon always rewards the effort.
Posted 23 January 2007, 12:18 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
Rob:
One of the great reads of my life, maybe as good as _GR_.
I don't think the post contains any spoilers, but I understand yr reluctance. I always assume w/ TP that I'm going to miss at least a quarter of the references, and that's probably the case w/ _ATD_, esp since I've not yet read _Mason and Dixon_, but even given that, one of the great reads of my life.
I think the rvws were tepid because Penguin sent the book to critics only two weeks prior to pub date, which in the case of a 1,000-page Pynchon novel is asking for trouble. It's such an odd decision that I think it must have been done on TP's instructions.
I don't pretend to understand the structure. I think a fully informed literary appreciation of _Against The Day_ will have to wait until the novel is reviewed by a critic who understands both American letters and German mathematics, a [John Updike+Bertrand Russell] type who can make all the math stuff seem easy as peach pie. When that critic appears, I won't be a bit surprised if it turns out that the plot discontinuities in _ATD_ are actually the result of the novel being constructed in strict accordance w/ an algorithm built of complex numbers.
It’s quite possible that I’m full of hooey on this point. The characteristic error of analysis is to percieve patterns that are not there.
Posted 23 January 2007, 1:04 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
Rob:
Do you have a favorite character so far?
Posted 23 January 2007, 1:11 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous scary_manilow says...
So far, a toss-up between:
Pugnax, the genius dog,
and
Webb Traverse, the anarchist bomber.
Although, the "floor show" guy made me laugh out loud for a very long time.
Posted 23 January 2007, 1:31 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
I grew quite fond of Kit, and I fell for Yashmeen and Dally right away. I always connect w/ Pynchon's women.
Pugmax is stupendous, and better read than I.
Posted 23 January 2007, 5:31 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous manofleisure says...
PQ,
Nice work, as usual. Happy to see the chops as honed as they are honeyed.
As for "psuedo-intellect"/"pretension:" hard to see how that applies. Pynchon, for what it's worth, likes to play with narrative like so much silly putty and rather grooves on all things subversive, creepy, off-beat, and flat out corny. Sure, there's rocket science, but last time I checked, none of these are even capable of reaching pretension. You'd have a better time finding pretension whilst listening to hipsters debate the Beach Boys "good" albums at The Tap Room, or swinging by the La Prima to hear folks hold court on Wallace Stevens and Ezra pound.
Cheers,
Luce
Posted 23 January 2007, 8:27 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
MoL:
Thanks. I cut it way down. There was a short period when it reached 3,500 wds, but sound counsel intervened.
The math stuff is interesting, though, and I think central to the novel's structure.
Posted 23 January 2007, 10 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous thetomdotdot says...
"I think trainskunk was making fun of you dweebs who think commenting on these blogs is an intellectual exercise."
Really? So what now, kid?
..
Posted 24 January 2007, 7:52 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous thetomdotdot says...
I've been afraid to pick up this book for fear I'll start smoking again. I can't imagine Pynchon without Luckies and Jim Beam.
Of course, I can't imagine Stephen King without Luckies and Jim Beam, so don't mind me.
Posted 24 January 2007, 7:56 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous OhioJayhawk says...
Hmmm...I guess I've now cataloged reason #127 why I'm happy I don't live in Lawrence anymore: Being called a pretentious pseudo-intellectual and a dork by a couple of anonymous, curiously angry-sounding nimrods after posting a compliment about a friend's writing style.
Yours sincerely,
Pat "Screw You I'm Not Afraid to Put My Name with My Words" Jones
Posted 24 January 2007, 8:23 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous lazz says...
C'mon, PJ, we have to tough it out. We can't let the loud-mouthed children win. They can stick around if they want, but they can't have it all to themselves.
Besides, wouldn't The Pretentious Pseudo-Intellectual Dorks be a great name for a softball team?
Posted 24 January 2007, 9:12 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous thetomdotdot says...
Pretentious Pseudo-Intellectual Dorks:
I love you all.
I can only aspire to be a poser. Just when I have mastered the dork component, I find my pseudo-intellectuality lacks pretention. Very frustrating. I now have, thanks to the multi-faceted kid, a new aspiration in redundant redundancy.
I enjoy these blogs, and am old enough to know that everyone is someone's dork.
Thanks for posting, PQ.
Posted 24 January 2007, 10:37 a.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
The removal of the kid's posts has left the comments section looking oddly Pynchonian, a record of conversation in which one participant is only partly present, here and not-here, as if locked in another universe that aligns w/ ours only occasionally....
Pugmax would have the proper answer, I'm sure.
I really encourage all readers to pick up _Against The Day_. It is the only novel known to me that is about light.
Posted 24 January 2007, 11:56 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous OhioJayhawk says...
Hey, there's reason #128 I won't ever move back: Censorship!
Cripes, I was mildly irritated (in a dorkish, pretentious sort of way), but I can't understand why those posts would be removed. You should probably delete my "Screw You..." comment as well then.
Still proud to be a PPID. I like Lazz's idea...we should get jerseys made up.
Posted 24 January 2007, 12:12 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous lazz says...
How much Pynchonian background does one need to tackle Against the Day, PQ? Must have digested the earliers first?
Posted 24 January 2007, 12:27 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous lazz says...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070124/ap_o...
Text message novel published in Finland
By jari tanner, Associated Press Writer 22 minutes ago
helsinki, Finland - A novel whose narrative consists entirely of mobile phone text messages has been published in Finland.
"The Last Messages" tells the story of a fictitious information-technology executive in Finland who resigns from his job and travels throughout Europe and India, keeping in touch with his friends and relatives only through text messages.
His messages, and the replies — roughly 1,000 altogether — are listed in chronological order in the 332-page novel written by Finnish author Hannu Luntiala. The texts are rife with grammatical errors and abbreviations commonly used in regular SMS traffic.
"I believe that, at the end of the day, a text message may reveal much more about a person than you would initially think," said Luntiala, who also is head of a company that keeps databases on people living in Finland.
Posted 24 January 2007, 12:32 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
PJ:
I disdain muzzles of all stripes and have made considerable noise to that effect 'round here. Had I been consulted, I would've told staff that I prefer the posts remain.
The decision to delete was made by site administrators who (I'm told) have a long history w/ the kid in question; this is apparently not the first time he's been kicked to the curb. As the poster himself observed (correctly) on another board, l.com is a private entity operated by the World Company, which possesses the unambiguous right to control their bandwidth however they please. If the worst thing the Man ever does to twiatitc is boot trainstop123456789/enginesroar/Brighter Than Lawrence/mordorsbane etc, well, I'll shake my finger at them--
shake-shake
--and call it good.
The object of the exercise was to prompt discussion of this astounding novel. The gems prompted by the kid--
"I can only aspire to be a poser. Just when I have mastered the dork component, I find my pseudo-intellectuality lacks pretention."
and PPID jerseys (_killer_ idea)--
well, those were frosting on the candy. My thanks to all.
Posted 24 January 2007, 1:09 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
lazz--
I don't think an intimate knowledge of Pynchon's previous novels is essential to _ATD_. TP regularly returns to certain characters and families--one can expect to find someone named "Bodine" in every novel, usually a sailor, and the Traverse family, at the center of _ATD_, has shown up before--but the novels are stand-alone works.
There is apparently a talking dog in _Mason & Dixon_, which I can only assume to be a forebear of the sublime Pugmax, but I haven't yet read _M&D_, so I dunno.
There's an unavoidable awkwardness in urging a 1,080-page book on one's friends. All I can do is repeat that this was one of the great reads of my life. It's a transcendent acomplishment. I've yet to see a rvw that begins to do it justice.
Posted 24 January 2007, 1:17 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
yikes!
"accomplishment"
Posted 24 January 2007, 1:23 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous lazz says...
Thanks PQ.
I'll come forward and say i clicked the "suggest removal" link on whatshisface's pseudo intellectual whatever ramblings. If that was a bad call, my error.
But I did so not so much for censorship as to suggest editing. Trimming of the rough edges. What was once a pretty vibrant online community too often dissolves into a cesspool of ignorant meanness cloaked in anonymity. I was so damn thrilled to see Patrick posting again, and especially on such a worthy topic that I know he has given immense consideration to, that my reaction to the typical spew was immediate and intense. I clicked "suggest removal" as a perhaps feeble attempt to nudge the schoolyard bullies into their own playgrounds.
And I still think we need more of this, a nip-and-tuck of the scruffiest blights. Stated another way, it doesn't seem quite sufficient that the only way to warrant removal is for inappapriate language or blatant libel/slander, or statements of those extreme nature. Stated another way, sometimes a host, for the good of the entire dinner party, must tell the drunk at the end of the table to shut up or leave.
Posted 24 January 2007, 1:32 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous kalcarloskals says...
Nice work PQ, good to hear from you again. Just about done w/GR and am thinking MD next. Any thoughts about V. or Vineland? Also, what are your thought WRT the purpose of allusion? Evocation, the possibility of recondite understanding, a sort of key to the work? I saw a university prof. (not a particularly good one) quite flummoxed(?) by this question in regards to Lolita. Drop some esoteric knowledge bombs on me. Curious as well if anyone else (Luce) has an opinion.
Kalender
Posted 24 January 2007, 2:04 p.m. Suggest removal
Phil Cauthon editer says...
hey guys, so you know i booted that guy for his repeated misogynistic postings on our lead story: http://www.lawrence.com/news/2007/jan/22...
when he's booted there, he's gone everywhere.
i don't remove comments for just being pointless, annoying, etc. bc i don't want my own personal threshold to stifle comments. i figure readers can ignore pettiness... but i don't want them to have to stumble on the types of things that violate our use policy.
that said, this is hardly an exact science and i'm willing to consider changes that will keep the constructive commenters coming back. —phil
Posted 24 January 2007, 2:10 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous Waylon_made_me says...
Hey PQ - I enjoyed your take on the book, but didn't you find many aspects of the writing to be... well, dry?
Posted 24 January 2007, 2:47 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
Thanks for the clarification, Phil. I noted the comments in question and expected that action would be taken, but I didn't realize that it would be global across all posts. Finger-shake w/drawn.
Geoff:
I loved both _V_ and _Vineland_, but I loved _V_ a little bit more, prolly because Benny Profane is the extradimensional brother from whom I was separated at birth. (A Navy thing....)
Either novel, btw, is an _excellent_ introduction to Pynchon for those readers a bit hesitant about _GR_ or _ATD_.
"...the purpose of allusion? Evocation, the possibility of recondite understanding, a sort of key to the work?"
Absolutely (imho). You've already encountered one of the biggest examples of Pynchon's comparisons of various categories of recondite knowlege. In _GR_ we are presented w/ parapsychological "truths"--the predictive powers of Slothrop's johnson, the eerie stuff going on at the White Visitation--in a story firmly contained by the physics of rigid moving bodies in conventional space. ESP is recondite; so (for most of us) is the ability to drop a warhead w/in 100 meters of its intended target from 2,000 miles away.
Just as _GR_ is "about" gravity, so _ATD_ is "about" light. (Pynchon takes his epigraph from Thelonius Monk: "It's always night, or we wouldn't need light.")
Light is an even more esoteric subject than gravity, because (in a literary sense) "light" includes the whole electromagnetic spectrum, which is a formally out-there weird place. If you dig into the stuff being kicked around at the highest levels of cosmology and physics, you vy quickly encounter concepts as esoteric as anything ever spouted by La Blavatsky--only this stuff is _real science_. (Predictable, reproduceable etc.) Pynchon's narrative in _Against The Day_ takes these concepts to their logical literary conclusion, while incorporating curiously similar parapsychological/folklore concepts that predate the science by centuries. In his fiction, shamans and scientists are two sides of the same coin, or sometimes three.
TP is our only cosmological novelist.
Posted 24 January 2007, 2:58 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
Waylon:
I don't find TP at all dry, but many readers do. I cheerfully confess that the math in _ATD_ left me in the dirt, but I spent a little time hitting the books and soon picked up enough to make sense of what I was reading. I suspect the formal mathematical structure of the text is too sophiticated for me to understand, but the _literary_ power of the mathematical concepts is really tremendous. Thus I still have only the vaguest formal understanding of quaternions, but I picked up enough online to make _Against the Day_ go like... well, like a rocket.
Quaternions are algebraic equations, an extension of the techniques of formal mathematics, developed in the nineteenth century. They enjoyed an early scientific and philosophic vogue because of their utility in describing operations in hypothetical four-dimensional space. The ability to talk about spaces of more than three dimensions was suddenly important at the turn of the century, because Big Science was knocking on the door to announce that "space" and "time" are really one thing, "spacetime," so we now have to reconsider this whole "dimension" topic, and by the way now all the math has to be done over. Quaternions were an essential element in redoing the math. When Einstein and his posse turned to their mathemetician colleagues and said, "We are now ready to talk about a Universe of more than three dimensions--are you?", quaternions, filled w/ risque new elements like complex numbers (a la "the square root of minus one") and division-by-zero, were a big reason that the math people could say, "Yes." These are the years when modern math got juiced.
[more]
Posted 24 January 2007, 3:10 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
Spacetime waits for no equation, and it wasn't long before quaternions were yesterday's popstars. The new math developed fast once the initial breakthroughs were out of the way, and soon quaternion analysis was left behind. Quaternions were allasudden a bit fuddy-duddy, and fell out of mathematical favor altogether when even more powerful jazzed-up exotic algebras were developed in the early twentieth century. Those initial quaternion-inspired mathematical visionaries were early-adopters, the intellectual equivalents of the first-generation internet enthusiasts who bought TRS-80 personal computers, hooked them to telephones, caught first sight of the coming Great Transformation and then watched in amazement as the land they pioneered was overrun by an army of newcomers equipped w/ slicker, more capable second-generation gear. (Pynchon imagines turn-of-the-century students of then-new techniques of vector analysis looking at quaternionists rather the way one looked at a Betamax owner in 1997. "Yes yes the picture is marvelous, and of course this one came first, pioneering and all, but it's as big as a house and I've seen all six Beta tapes, and he does get a bit glassy-eyed when he starts talking about the thing, not healthy really....")
The new math arrived w/ the Modern, indeed, was a precipitating agent of the Modern, a big reason that that the twentieth century was so much more wonderful and terrible than the nineteenth. Pynchon's quaternionists, these early adopters, these proto-Moderns, were among the vy first people _ever_ to rigorously think about the possibilities of startling new models of the Universe, and they did so before any sort of clammy orthodoxy had settled upon the new thinking.
This business of crazy powerful math, extra dimensions, mysterious radiations of unknown origin, a Universe far different from that imagined by Euclid and Newton--all of this was a _real_ paradigm shift, and Pynchon's hotshot math kids, frontier tinkerers, weapons merchants and secret agents saw the shift before anyone else. They saw it when most people were still travelling in buggies and men in the American West still wore guns on their belts, when much of the world still groaned beneath the heels of illiberal kings and sultans, when people were just beginning to grasp--although probably not to understand--that it was now possible to build machines that fly and electric boxes that transmit the human voice across miles of empty space.
Posted 24 January 2007, 3:17 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
I don't pretend to understand what Pynchon's _really_ doing at the deepest structural levels of _ATD_. As I said above, I'm inclined to think the plot is algorithmic. But as a _literary_ device, a perspective from which to view the essence of the age--the essence of The Day--it works like gangbusters. It's not everyone's cuppa tea, I know, but boy howdy it's a nice break from Another Novel About Academics and Their Mid-Life Crises. TP's characters have MLCs too, but tend to respond by walking through walls of shooting someone.
I likes it.
Posted 24 January 2007, 3:18 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous thetomdotdot says...
"What was once a pretty vibrant online community too often dissolves into a cesspool of ignorant meanness cloaked in anonymity."
Who's not guilty of that on occasion?
I am the level of dork that at least visits here almost everyday. I miss you guys when you don't post. Deciding how drunk is too drunk and how loud is too loud is tricky ground which, in all honesty, has been navigated well here. Except for Misty's logo, but anyways. I know I can say Dolph is an asshole without getting removed. Which, in its way, makes me appreciate Dolph more than the reputation that precedes him. To be honest, the whole Simons bashing milieu is a little tiresome.
While I am guilty of playing on and perpetuating some of the sillier riffs around here, it's usually because I'm waiting around for something substantial to happen. There have been some fantastic discussions on this site that keep me coming back drooling. You should see my desk.
That being said, I saw the comments on the lead story and I'da tossed the drunk out too. Sorry, trainspot, but thats way too far and unnecessary. I thought you was funny otherwise.
As far as anonymity as a measure of manhood, anyone who doesn't know who I am, and cares to face to face on any issue, there's no fence around my ass. Just contact me and we'll get together. But past that, I have pretty good control over my google juice and am going to keep it that way.
Thats just me.
Posted 24 January 2007, 3:21 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
I should note that quaternions are on the comeback trail in the digital age because, according to the testimony of a number of people who make their living doing things I don't pretend to understand, quaternions are ideal mathematical tools for the generation of 3-D CGI programming.
[Cue off-camera maniacal laughter from the shades of Thea von Harbou and Rudolph Klein-Rogge....]
By the way, it is said that deep in the bowels of the European Alps dwells the _Tatzelwurm_, a mysterious crypto-reptile looking something like a Komodo dragon minus the back legs. It can see in the dark, it's lightning fast and it grows as big as a man. The _Tatzelwurm_ kills its victims, including humans, by emitting a foul cloud of incapacitating toxic gas before lunging in for the ripping work. It has big claws and teeth and green blood.
There's a _Tatzelwurm_ in _Against The Day_, and it talks.
Posted 24 January 2007, 3:27 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous kalcarloskals says...
Well put PQ. My aforementioned prof's response was, "to show off how smart they are", which I found to be an incredibly demeaning comment about the work he had chosen, Lolita. As well, allusion seems to me to function as setting, these events take place in a world governed by the understanding of previous texts. That is, Lolita is under the auspices of 'Anabel Lee', and therefore this text forms the axiomatic structure that Lolita must follow, or, can otherwise form the significance of the break. To cull from GR, the Hansel and Gretel motif exists to form the paradigm where the irony of its lack of completion (wanted to write culmanation(?) but spell check won't pick up) provides the juxtaposition necessary to perceive the imbalance btwn expected vs. received. I guess.
Kalender
Posted 24 January 2007, 3:34 p.m. Suggest removal
Terry Bush ladylaw says...
Hey PQ - I'm away in DC land, but will return soon...meanwhile...welcome back. Haven't read the book, but will try to do so on your recommendation!
Posted 24 January 2007, 3:41 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
It's often said that _GR_ is "about" entropy, and that Slothrop's odd disappearance is a narratization of the tendency of all physical systems to fall into ever-increasing states of disorganization. (OK, "chaos." There. I said it )
On the other hand, the man is a _novelist_, and the first rule is, "There are no rules." I don't think TP will ever permit himself to be _entirely_ contained by a formal schema.
So I'm, uh, contradicting what I posted above about "strict" algorithmic structure. So be it. I contradict myself. (I am vast, I contain multitudes etc.) It's prolly best to maintain a healthy skepticism about _any_ sweeping critical assertion about the Pynchon Universe, most especially about this originating here.
As I said, the man blew up my head 30 years ago, and I've been looking for alla pieces ever since.
Posted 24 January 2007, 3:47 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
Thanks, LL. Watch yerself out there in Washington. Makes Pynchon's Universe look like an elementary school playground.
Posted 24 January 2007, 3:48 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous Waylon_made_me says...
Wow. That was a REALLY long answer to my short question, but thanks.
Posted 24 January 2007, 4:28 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
Sorry, Waylon. I usually do a better job of keeping this under control, but it's a helluva novel.
Posted 24 January 2007, 4:33 p.m. Suggest removal
Joel Mathis Joel says...
"While I am guilty of playing on and perpetuating some of the sillier riffs around here..."
You can dark roast that again.
Posted 24 January 2007, 4:34 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous lazz says...
Hey Quinn, if we the Pretentious Pseudo-Intellectual Dorks softball team off the ground, think we can get Pynchon to come and play first for us?
Important question -- will we be known as "the pseuds", or "the dorks"?
And who's pitching?
Oh right, David Ryan on the hill ...
Posted 24 January 2007, 4:48 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous thetomdotdot says...
Joel:
That was not a silly riff. The darker roast than Folgers riff had a roast darker than Folgers.
The key phrase for you in all that gibberish was "I miss you guys when you don't post."
The roast of this Pynchon discussion is darker than Folgers at midnight.
I am happy today.
Posted 24 January 2007, 5:15 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
I think we should insist on "no nicknames." We should be referred to by the full team title on all occasions, and dorkily correct ppl who refer to us any other way. We should be tiresome about the hyphen, and somehow incorporate beanies.
Posted 24 January 2007, 6:03 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous OtherJoel says...
Your blog piqued my curiousity, so I popped by the public library and grabbed a copy of Against the Day last night. Turns out that, due to the fact that it is relatively new, its only a 2-week checkout; no renewals. When it was my turn in line, the librarian looked at the book, then looked at me and said, "I hope you're a fast reader."
So I guess I better get started.
Posted 24 January 2007, 8:28 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
Yes! The Esoteric Doctrine passes into the hands of yet another potential convert!
Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha! [hunched over rubbing hands w/ delight]
Posted 24 January 2007, 8:52 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous OhioJayhawk says...
Sorry I raised the specter of censorship without knowing the facts. Didn't know this guy was misogynistic. Unfortunately, as a PPID, I don't actually understand what misogynistic means. I'll have to ask my wife, I guess.
BTW, I suggest bringing Bill "The Spaceman" Lee out of retirement as our pitcher. Now he's PPID and he can throw the knuckler.
And let's get Jill Ensley (Godjilla) to design the jerseys. I've never met her, don't know her, have no clue if she has any jersey design skills, but I love her attitude and the mysterious, hypnotic, deliciously cock-eyed photo on her blog.
Posted 25 January 2007, 11:05 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous lazz says...
Yes, Godjilla should design the jersey, but she also has to be on the team. I'm pegging her as a strong right fielder. Hell, we could even get Blankenship back for this, and he certainly deserves a roster spot among Pretentious Pseud-Intellectual Dorks. OK, let's see, Luce in center, Spaceman Lee on the hill, Quinn behind the plate, PJ all over third, Blankenship at short, Dave Ryan at second, Godjilla patrolling right, scrappy Wayne Propst in left and batting lead-off, Commissioner King as manager, and Lazz in charge of icing down the team beverages (imported only, please.)
Whaddy'all think?
What about a batting order?
Posted 25 January 2007, 11:15 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous lazz says...
Actually, now that I think about it, since we're in Lawrence, Pretentious Pseudo-Intellectual Dorks wouldn't so much be a team as it would a league ...
Posted 25 January 2007, 11:16 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous Waylon_made_me says...
Say what you will about trainstork...
Seems to me that when she is involved, the comments are more engaging and plentiful.
Posted 25 January 2007, 11:24 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous thetomdotdot says...
If PPID is a league, then Clannish Lawrence Insider Townies would be a team. I know it doesn't quite flow, but the acronym has a delicious ring, no?
Posted 25 January 2007, 11:34 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous Waylon_made_me says...
That sounds misogynistic to me.
Posted 25 January 2007, 11:44 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous thetomdotdot says...
Pseudo-misogynistic?
Posted 25 January 2007, 11:58 a.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
Cauthon should serve as the team owner, and attend all owner meetings waving a slide rule in a faintly menacing manager while muttering about "XML protocols" and "bad code."
Lazz will set the line every week on the basis of an algorithm derived from the works of a Portugese novelist whose work has not yet been translated into English.
As the catcher, I will select pitches for Spaceman by rolling a 12-sided die. I'll require batters to complete a short essay examination on Robert Musil's _The Man Without Qualities_ prior to stepping into the box, said essays to graded by the second baseman.
I think Jill should design jerseys, beanies and vinyl pocket protectors, which will be our team merch. We should try to get a shoe deal w/ Florsheim.
Posted 25 January 2007, 12:02 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous gutwrench says...
Wow, quinno. You have posted 21 times on your own blog. I mean, nice piece and all, but glad I'm not your boss.
Posted 25 January 2007, 12:11 p.m. Suggest removal
Patrick Quinn quinno says...
So am I.
Posted 25 January 2007, 12:12 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous gutwrench says...
Nice come back.
quinno: 1
gutwrench: 0
Posted 25 January 2007, 12:13 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous lazz says...
Commissioner King flew into a horrific rage when I stopped into the Pig and informed him of my suggested lineup. He ordered me thrown into the stockade and pelted with old Wheatfields loaves. Oh the horrors! Turns out that his only objection was that we -- or should I say, I, and take full blame for the crime! -- left out his Crown Prince Bomstad. Commissioner King decreed that Crown Prince Bomstad shall play "fluffer." At which suggestion Crown Prince Bomstad grinned and muttered something unrepeatable among decent folk.
So there we are: Crown Prince Bomstad at fluffer.
Looks like we should be set.
Posted 25 January 2007, 1:53 p.m. Suggest removal
Don Mittelstaedt subsalr says...
Patrick,
Reassuring to find out you are still with us! Please send updated contact info as soon as feasible.
Good thing you got out of the high country so you could excape the shitty winter weather!
Don M.
Posted 25 January 2007, 4:54 p.m. Suggest removal
Terry Bush ladylaw says...
WOW - the master is back. There hasn't been a blog with this many comments made to it in quite awhile! Congrats. And yes, the DC and surrounding area folks are in another world. One I do not want to visit again for a long long time.... I have rarely been around so many extremely rude (unhappy) people....and that's not even counting the strangers stuck in the parking lot they call the 395/295/95 Beltway! I did see copies of said novel being sold in the airport kiosks. Only one left, so they must be going well.... I, however, did not buy it there. Better to bring my money home with me!
Posted 26 January 2007, 12:29 p.m. Suggest removal
Tom King tomking says...
ladylaw,
The reason there are so many comments? Two-thirds of them are Quinn's. It's sickening.
Posted 27 January 2007, 10:12 a.m. Suggest removal
Terry Bush ladylaw says...
I didn't count them up, but still 50 comments is not shabby...Still glad he's back!
Posted 1 February 2007, 2:53 p.m. Suggest removal
Jill Ensley godjilla says...
WHOA, what's this. I click to see what the hell would inspire 71 comments and I see my name in lights, tiny little pixelated lights.
I would totally design merch for your crazy-ass team (I DID make this one: http://www.shamelessbastards.com/ronwils... after all)...but only if we can play kickball, dodgeball, or soccer instead. Ping Pong? Scrabble?
ALSO, OhioJayhawk, I agree with reasons #127 and #128 and wager I'd agree with the previous 126. Me and my cocked-eye thank you for the props.
and then this, hey...quinno, you can type 24374289 words in a comment but yet you abbreviate "your" and "perhaps"? Two letters? Really? Explain.
-The Pretentious Psuedo-Intellectual Grammar Polizi
Posted 2 February 2007, 1:10 a.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous lazz says...
Kickball and dodgeball would work. No soccer. Too many smokers on the team.
Or maybe we could just make it, like, a cocktail olympics or something along those lines.
Posted 2 February 2007, 4:29 p.m. Suggest removal
Anonymous OhioJayhawk says...
Jill:
The World Company is #56 on my list, so I feel your pain (as expressed in your recent column). My mom was a high school English teacher in Lawrence and she struggled mightily (but, obviously, with little success) to teach the current Czar of TWC to read and write. I'm absolutely serious. Now the man pens editorials and shapes the opinions of others. Go figure.
#1 on the list, BTW, was that the soul of Lawrence died the day they tore down The Sanctuary to build more cheap-ass apartments, but you were probably still watching the Ninja Turtles in your PJs when that happened.
Posted 2 February 2007, 9:50 p.m. Suggest removal
Jill Ensley godjilla says...
Is the "art scene" on there somewhere? Cause I have some bones to pick and it's high on mine.
And no, I was probably wee and in Topuka no less. But whenever I get down on Larryville, I just think....well, I could be living in Topeka.
Posted 2 February 2007, 11:21 p.m. Suggest removal
Terry Bush ladylaw says...
Ah...the Sanctuary...I remember..... Time marches on. Indeed.
Posted 5 February 2007, 1:33 p.m. Suggest removal
Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.